Comments on: Defining “Dynasty” http://ballgamespoints.com/2009/02/07/defining-dynasty/ Tue, 22 May 2012 03:44:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: The Truth http://ballgamespoints.com/2009/02/07/defining-dynasty/comment-page-1/#comment-3550 The Truth Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:33:33 +0000 http://ballgamespoints.com/?p=186#comment-3550 What is hockey... is that a sport? What is hockey… is that a sport?

]]> By: el rif http://ballgamespoints.com/2009/02/07/defining-dynasty/comment-page-1/#comment-3512 el rif Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:00:59 +0000 http://ballgamespoints.com/?p=186#comment-3512 hear, hear hear, hear

]]> By: eddy http://ballgamespoints.com/2009/02/07/defining-dynasty/comment-page-1/#comment-3508 eddy Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:17:11 +0000 http://ballgamespoints.com/?p=186#comment-3508 i just wrote a long winded response to reach the ultimate conclusion that I agreed with you. but my computer crashed so i'll just say no beef, except for the glaring omission of the NHL, the league which has sported the most true dynasties of any of the majors. Fans of the Game demand to know why you left out the Edmonton Oilers (winners of 5 out of 7 from '83 to '90), the Islanders (4 straight '79-'83), les Habitants, the Montreal Canadiens (10 of 15 from '64 to '79 and 5 straight from '55-'60) the post-war Leafs (5 out of 7 during the heady days of the Truman administration) and the not-to-be-messed-with Montreal Victorias, winners of 4 out of 5 from 1894 to 1898-and it would have been 5 out of 5, if not for the infamous "mustache wax incident", the details of which are lost to history but supposedly involved the on-ice antics of one of those bicycles with a really big wheel and a really small wheel. The point is, hockey is here to stay, and its about time fools recognized. i just wrote a long winded response to reach the ultimate conclusion that I agreed with you. but my computer crashed so i’ll just say no beef, except for the glaring omission of the NHL, the league which has sported the most true dynasties of any of the majors. Fans of the Game demand to know why you left out the Edmonton Oilers (winners of 5 out of 7 from ‘83 to ‘90), the Islanders (4 straight ‘79-’83), les Habitants, the Montreal Canadiens (10 of 15 from ‘64 to ‘79 and 5 straight from ‘55-’60) the post-war Leafs (5 out of 7 during the heady days of the Truman administration) and the not-to-be-messed-with Montreal Victorias, winners of 4 out of 5 from 1894 to 1898-and it would have been 5 out of 5, if not for the infamous “mustache wax incident”, the details of which are lost to history but supposedly involved the on-ice antics of one of those bicycles with a really big wheel and a really small wheel.
The point is, hockey is here to stay, and its about time fools recognized.

]]> By: Tom Stanley http://ballgamespoints.com/2009/02/07/defining-dynasty/comment-page-1/#comment-3492 Tom Stanley Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:15:03 +0000 http://ballgamespoints.com/?p=186#comment-3492 I was on Yahoo and found your blog. Read a few of your other posts. Good work. I am looking forward to reading more from you in the future. Tom Stanley I was on Yahoo and found your blog. Read a few of your other posts. Good work. I am looking forward to reading more from you in the future.

Tom Stanley

]]>